Wear, Corrosion, and Reliability in Mechanical Engineering
(Level 5 - Degradation Over Time and Designing for Survival)
Most mechanical systems do not fail suddenly—they degrade gradually through wear, corrosion, and environmental attack. Level 5 introduces the mechanisms of long-term degradation and the principles of reliability engineering.
At this stage, the focus is on understanding how systems fail over time and how engineers design for maintainability, inspection, and predictable service life.
What Wear Is and Why It's Inevitable
Wear is the slow death of moving parts. Progressive removal or displacement of material from surfaces in contact—the reality is that all mechanical systems with moving components experience wear. You can't eliminate it. You can only slow it down and manage it. Every bearing wears, every gear tooth loses material, every sliding surface degrades. The question isn't if, it's when and how fast.
Four main mechanisms drive wear. Adhesive wear—material transfers between surfaces, you get galling and scuffing when parts weld microscopically and tear. Abrasive wear—hard particles cut into softer surfaces like sandpaper, grinding and scratching their way through. Fatigue wear—repeated contact stress causes surface cracks that turn into pitting and spalling, chunks breaking off. Fretting wear—tiny oscillatory motion at contact points, looks minor but causes serious surface damage over time.
Wear leads to loss of tolerance, increased clearances, vibration that wasn't there before, and eventual failure. Understanding which wear mechanism dominates lets you pick appropriate materials and lubrication strategies. Get it wrong and your bearings fail in months instead of years. Get it right and you extend service life dramatically—same design, just smarter material choices and better lubrication.
Corrosion Is Chemical Attack
Corrosion is the environment slowly eating your parts. Degradation through chemical or electrochemical reaction—unlike wear, corrosion doesn't need mechanical contact. Just exposure. Moisture, salt, acids, even oxygen in the air—all of them attack metal and break it down molecule by molecule. You can have a perfectly stationary part with zero mechanical stress and it'll still corrode itself to death given time and the wrong environment.
Corrosion comes in different flavors and some are way worse than others. Uniform corrosion—the whole surface corrodes evenly, easy to detect and predict. Not great but manageable. Galvanic corrosion—put dissimilar metals in contact with an electrolyte and the more reactive one corrodes faster. Steel bolts in aluminum frames? The aluminum's getting sacrificed. Pitting corrosion—localized attack creates deep holes, dangerous because it's hard to detect and punches through thickness fast. Crevice corrosion—happens in tight gaps where oxygen can't reach, creates concentrated corrosion cells. Stress corrosion cracking (SCC)—combine tensile stress with a corrosive environment and you get cracks forming at stress way below yield strength.
The really dangerous corrosion is localized or hidden. Pitting and SCC cause sudden failure with almost no warning. The surface looks fine, maybe some minor discoloration, then boom—catastrophic crack propagation. You can't just eyeball it during inspection. By the time you see obvious corrosion damage, it's already deep into the material.
Wear and Corrosion Together Are Worse
Here's where it gets brutal: wear and corrosion happening simultaneously accelerate each other. Tribocorrosion or erosion-corrosion—the combination is way worse than either alone. Wear removes protective oxide layers, exposing fresh reactive metal to the environment. Corrosion weakens and roughens the surface, making it more susceptible to wear. They feed each other in a degradation loop.
The total degradation rate isn't just additive—it's synergistic. 1 + 1 = 3 in this case. Pump impellers in seawater experience both cavitation erosion and saltwater corrosion. Bearings running in corrosive fluids get worn down mechanically while also being chemically attacked. Offshore structures deal with wave impact plus constant salt exposure. Each mechanism enables and accelerates the other.
You can't design for just wear or just corrosion in these environments. You need protection against both, and you need to understand how they interact. Otherwise your predicted service life will be wildly optimistic and you'll be replacing components way earlier than planned.
Protecting Against Wear
You can't stop wear completely, but you can slow it down dramatically. Lubrication—separate the surfaces with oil or grease and friction drops, wear rate plummets. Boundary lubrication, hydrodynamic lubrication, different regimes for different applications, but the principle is the same: keep metal from touching metal. Hard coatings—apply ceramic, nitride, or carbide coatings to resist abrasive wear. The coating wears instead of the base material, and it wears way slower.
Material selection matters. Tool steels, case-hardened surfaces, wear-resistant alloys—each has specific applications where it excels. Surface finish—polished surfaces reduce adhesive wear because there are fewer surface asperities to weld and tear. Design for sacrificial wear—use replaceable wear plates, bushings, or liners. Let a cheap consumable part take the wear damage instead of the expensive main component.
In most real systems, wear is accepted and managed through periodic replacement. Brake pads wear out—that's the design. Bearings have rated life based on expected wear rates. Seals degrade and get replaced. The engineering challenge isn't eliminating wear, it's making sure worn parts get replaced before they cause secondary damage or catastrophic failure.
Protecting Against Corrosion
Corrosion protection starts with material selection. Stainless steel, aluminum alloys, titanium, plastics—each resists specific corrosive environments better than plain carbon steel. But materials alone aren't always enough or practical. Protective coatings—paint, galvanizing (zinc coating), anodizing (for aluminum)—create a barrier between the metal and environment. The coating degrades instead of the substrate, and when it fails, you recoat.
Cathodic protection—use sacrificial anodes (zinc or magnesium that corrode preferentially) or impressed current systems to make the structure the cathode in the corrosion cell. Ships, pipelines, offshore platforms all use this. Design to avoid moisture traps—eliminate crevices, ensure drainage, don't create pockets where water can sit. Standing water plus oxygen equals aggressive corrosion. Environmental control—dehumidification, sealed enclosures with dry nitrogen, anything that keeps moisture and corrosive agents away from sensitive parts.
Here's the key insight: corrosion protection is most cost-effective when built into the initial design. Trying to retrofit corrosion protection after the design is locked in? Expensive, difficult, and usually incomplete. You end up with access issues, coating adhesion problems, and parts you just can't protect adequately. Design it right from the start or accept accelerated degradation.
Reliability Engineering Basics
Reliability is the probability your system works when you need it to. More precisely: the probability that a system performs its intended function without failure for a specified time under specified conditions. It's a statistical measure, not a guarantee. 95% reliability over 10,000 hours means 5% of units will fail before then. That's predictable, manageable—what you can't accept is surprise failures you didn't anticipate.
Key concepts: Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)—average operating time between failures for repairable systems. Failure rate—how many failures per unit time, usually failures per million hours. The bathtub curve—failure rate is high early in life (infant mortality from manufacturing defects), low during useful life (random failures), then high again at end of life (wear-out failures). This curve tells you when to burn in components, when they're most reliable, and when to replace them proactively.
Redundancy increases reliability—backup systems, parallel components, fail-safe designs. If one path fails, another takes over. Aircraft have redundant hydraulic systems, data centers have redundant power, critical valves have backup actuators. Reliability engineering uses statistical methods to predict failure rates and design maintenance schedules that prevent unexpected failures. Replace parts before they hit their wear-out phase. Inspect at intervals based on crack growth rates, not arbitrary calendar schedules.
Designing for Maintainability and Inspection
Systems often fail not because of bad design, but because nobody could inspect or maintain them properly. Accessibility—if critical components are buried behind panels that require three hours to remove, they won't get inspected as often as they should. Inspectors skip them or do cursory checks. Put inspection ports and access panels where they're actually needed. Modularity—design in replaceable subassemblies that can swap out quickly. Entire pump cartridges instead of field-rebuilding pumps. Motor modules that bolt in and out. Reduces downtime, reduces maintenance errors.
Inspection access—provide ports, windows, or removable sections so you can actually see what's happening inside. Wear indicators—built-in sensors, visual markers, measurement points that show degradation before failure. Brake pad wear indicators, oil debris sensors, vibration monitors. You want to detect problems early, not discover them during catastrophic failure. Standardization—use common fastener sizes, standard interfaces, commercially available replacement parts. Custom proprietary components are maintenance nightmares.
The best systems use condition-based maintenance—monitor the actual condition, replace when degraded, not on arbitrary time schedules. More reliable and cost-effective than time-based maintenance. You're not replacing parts that still have life left, and you're not running parts past their safe operating window. Design for maintenance access from day one, or accept that critical components won't get maintained properly. It's that simple.
Why This Level Matters
Understanding wear, corrosion, and reliability changes how you think about engineering completely. The goal isn't perfection—it's predictable, manageable degradation. Everything wears. Everything corrodes. Everything eventually fails. Your job is to make sure those failures happen on schedule, where you expect them, in ways you've planned for. Not as surprises that cause catastrophic damage or safety incidents.
This level teaches you to recognize wear and corrosion mechanisms so you can select materials and protective strategies that actually work in your operating environment. You learn to design for inspection and maintenance—because the best design in the world is useless if nobody can service it properly. You apply reliability principles to predict service life, set inspection intervals, and decide when components should be replaced proactively instead of reactively.
This knowledge is essential for designing durable, maintainable systems that survive real-world conditions over their intended service life. You've now completed How Things Fail—you understand the major failure modes mechanical engineers must consider: stress, material failure, fatigue, creep, buckling, thermal effects, wear, and corrosion. Use this to design safer, more reliable systems that fail predictably when they do fail, giving you time to intervene before catastrophe.
You've Completed How Things Fail!
You now understand the major failure modes that mechanical engineers must consider: stress, material failure, fatigue, creep, buckling, thermal effects, wear, and corrosion. Use this knowledge to design safer, more reliable systems.
Return to How Things Fail Overview